[Mark Levine provided a Q&A analysis of the selection of the President. Titled:
THE “GORE EXCEPTION”:A Layman's Guide To The Supreme Court Decision In Bush V. Gore
Having read the decision myself, I asked him the following question.]
> Is my logic correct that the only thing bipartisan was the dissent?
His reply: yes.
There was no 7-2 decision. That was the spin of the Five Lawless Justices.
Note that none of the four dissenters concurred in any part of the majority
decision. If the had, it would have written "concurring in part, dissenting
in part."
Don't be fooled.
[Link added 2-11-07 although originally an email and this reflects an exchange with it's author at the time]
No comments:
Post a Comment